“If someone is touting a product as halal, it should be regulated as such,” said Atiya Aftab, an attorney in South Brunswick and member of the board of overseers of the Islamic Society of Central Jersey. “You need to have that element of the government overseeing labeling. On the other hand, there is that responsibility on the individual to do some sort of due diligence.”
There is also a growing group of Muslims, like Aftab and Muhammad, who value how animals are treated before they are killed as much as how they are killed.
Hamzah Wald Maqbul, of the nonprofit Halal Advocates, said that the intricacies of halal and separation of church and state make it difficult for the government to fully prosecute fraud.
“What they can do, like many states do, there are halal laws that revolve around the idea of transparency,” he said. “If someone claims something is halal, the consumer has the right to know what the definition of halal is according to that vendor . but (that’s a) far cry from being able to enforce it.”
New Jersey adopted the Halal Food Consumer Protection Act in 2000, requiring halal food sellers to disclose information, including whether they sell both halal and non-halal food. It put out a reminder last week reminding businesses and consumers of the law, which includes fines as high as $10,000 for first-time offenders.
Nine states now have similar laws, including New York, which requires halal establishments and certifiers register with the state.
New Jersey regulators have visited more than 600 halal businesses since 2013, according to the Division of Consumer Affairs, but have not issued any violations. There is no known public database of violations for selling non-halal meat as halal.
In November 2011, a supermarket chain in Anaheim, California, paid $527,000 after it sold regular meat as halal, and a wholesaler in England was fined nearly $100,000 last year after investigators caught the company putting the halal label on chicken that was traced to a supplier that did not sell halal meat.
Late last year, the owners of a halal beef supplier in Iowa were charged with selling $4.9 million in beef that prosecutors said did not follow the halal practices it promised. A manager pleaded guilty to directing workers at the Midamar Corp. to repackage beef products from a slaughterhouse that wasn’t approved for export to Malaysia and Indonesia.
So says a meat supplier once offered to sell him “50/50 meat” – half halal and half not. “If you’re going to give someone the chance to do something fishy, they are going to do it. If I am selling this meat and I am certifying it as (halal), then it is on me.”
Observant Muslims aren’t supposed to eat pork or drink alcohol, but there is a range of opinions on what is considered halal; for instance, some Muslims are OK eating poultry killed by machines, and some aren’t.
The USDA inspects products made from ritually slaughtered animals – both halal and kosher food that meets standards of Jewish law – but leaves decisions on whether the ritual is acceptable to religious organizations that certify meat as halal.
The company has denied wrongdoing and moved to dismiss the case, arguing the charges violate the First Amendment. Islamic Services of America, which certified halal beef for Midamar, said the U.S. government can’t enforce religious slaughter protocols.